Quantcast
Channel: Hedge Funds
Viewing all 1293 articles
Browse latest View live

Citadel just cut a team managing more than $1 billion after an analyst and a data scientist broke internal compliance rules about trading in personal accounts

$
0
0

Ken Griffin

  • The analyst Josh Lingsch and the data scientist Derek Allums were fired by Citadel after they broke one of the firm's rules for trading in personal accounts, sources told Business Insider.
  • They were a part of a nine-person team in Texas that was focused on energy investments.
  • Jarrad Bourger, the portfolio manager of the team, was fired because of performance reasons unrelated to the compliance issue, a source close to the firm said.
  • The team managed more than $1 billion, and the portfolio was liquidated after Lingsch and Allums were dismissed.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Citadel has liquidated a portfolio with more than $1 billion in energy investments run out of Texas after the analyst Josh Lingsch and the data scientist Derek Allums were fired from the firm this week for violating the firm's rules around trading in personal accounts. 

The team of nine people was the worst-performing team at Citadel this year of the more than 30 portfolio groups in the firm's global-equities business, a source close to the firm said. Some members of that now shuttered team have now joined other teams at the firm. Citadel manages a total of $32 billion. 

Sources said the team did perform well during the recent oil spike, when the price of crude jumped nearly 20% and hit many hedge funds that had made bearish bets on the commodity

The precise nature of the two people's trading violations in their personal accounts could not be determined, and the firm declined to comment when asked about the details of the infractions. 

Jarrad Bourger, the portfolio manager for the group, was fired for performance reasons, the same source told Business Insider, but was not involved with the compliance violations.

"Citadel has always had a strong, robust culture of compliance, and we expect all of our employees to act with the highest levels of integrity," a spokesperson for the hedge fund said in a statement. 

Read more: Ken Griffin's Citadel is losing a longtime money-manager and the COO of its Global Equities business

When Citadel sent out an email to employees about the liquidation of the portfolio and the dismissal of the majority of the team, an email from the compliance department followed shortly after, sources told Business Insider. The email from compliance was a reminder of the rules around trading in personal accounts. 

According to his LinkedIn profile, Lingsch had been with Citadel for almost two years, previously working as an analyst for Arete Investment Group in Austin, Texas, for more than four years. Allums had been with Citadel for less than a year, working previously for Point72 as a research analyst on the healthcare team and as a vice president with the venture-capital arm of Steve Cohen's firm. Both did not respond to requests for comment. Bourger could not be reached for comment. 

The firm's flagship fund, Wellington, is up 14.2% for the year through the end of August, besting many of the firm's multistrategy peers. The average hedge fund, according to Hedge Fund Research, is up 7.8% through the first eight months of year. 

Read more: Humans are beating machines, and Pershing Square and Greenlight are crushing it. Here's how hedge funds performed in the first half.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nxivm leader Keith Raniere has been convicted. Here's what happened inside his sex-slave ring that recruited actresses and two billionaire heiresses.


WorldQuant's Igor Tulchinsky just guaranteed his team 75% of last year's performance bonus to soothe nerves as quant funds get slammed

$
0
0

Igor Tulchinsky

It's been a tough year so far for quant funds, but WorldQuant employees can breathe a little easier now. 

Regardless of how the Millennium spin-off's performance shakes out for 2019, quants, researchers, investors, and more who work for Igor Tulchinsky know that their bonuses can shrink only so much.

The quant platform, which manages more than $7 billion, sent out a company-wide communication recently confirming that employees would receive at least 75% of last year's performance bonus this year.

A source close to the firm told Business Insider that the goal of the guarantee was to calm employees who are worried about getting paid in a year that has been tough on quants.

Read more: Izzy Englander just landed a quant team that was managing hundreds of millions for billionaire Michael Platt

The firm declined to comment. WorldQuant's performance isn't often broken out from Millennium's overall performance, which is up about 6% through the end of July. The firm's flagship was up nearly 5% last year, when the average hedge fund lost money.

A big part of compensation in the hedge-fund industry is typically tied to performance bonuses on top of base salaries. That can mean big paydays in good years, but relatively leaner pay checks when fund performance is weak.

Quant funds have had a rough year. Traditional stock pickers like Pershing Square and Greenlight Capital have dominated, while firms like Renaissance Technologies and Winton Group have been mediocre. More competition in the quant space has pushed up prices for talent, as well as unique datasets. 

WorldQuant has tried to push down the costs for alternative data by running a platform that lets data providers come directly to them instead of going through an aggregation platform or a data buyer. 

Read more: Alternative-data player Thasos just laid off the majority of its staff and its CEO resigned. It might be a sign of tough times to come for a market set to grow to $7 billion.

The collapse in momentum stocks earlier this month also hit many quants that took bearish bets on traditional value stocks while piling onto well-performing equities. 

"Everything that worked all year got sacked and whacked," one quant told Business Insider earlier this month. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The US women's national team dominates soccer, but here's why the US men's team sucks

Cliff Asness' AQR has placed bets against Adyen and Worldline, two of Europe's biggest players in the buzzy payments space

$
0
0

Cliff Asness

  • AQR is betting against one-time unicorn Adyen Global, a Dutch payments company, and French payments company Worldline, according to data company Breakout Point.
  • The two short positions are worth a combined $175 million — roughly 0.5% of the firms' combined market caps. 
  • AQR is the second hedge fund to take a big short position in Adyen, Breakout Point's data show, but hedge funds and investors in general have not bet against the growing payments space. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories. 

Payments company Adyen Global's soaring stock price — it's up more than 50% since it went public last June — has attracted another short-seller.

AQR, which runs more than $190 billion across its hedge funds, mutual funds, and other products, recently shorted the company, according to data company Breakout Point which tracks short positions in European companies. This follows a $115 million bet against the company by Mapleline Capital in February

The fund and Adyen declined to comment.  

It's at least the second big short position AQR, which is a systematic manager that uses algorithms to determine its investments, has made in the payments sector. Breakout Point's data show that AQR also has a $71 million short on French payments company Worldline, which it made in August. No other hedge fund has a current short position this big in either company. 

Worldline did not respond to requests for comment.

See more: $183 million short-seller Spruce Point is targeting the maker of Trojan condoms and Arm & Hammer baking soda

AQR has not always been negative on the prospects of the growing European payments space, records show. These are the first short positions they have taken in the space, according to Breakout Point. 

The firm doesn't do traditional fundamental reviews of companies, instead investing based on different factors in the manager's algorithm-led strategies. AQR also made bets against companies linked to Woodford Capital, the fund run by Neil Woodford that blew up over illiquid investments earlier this year. 

See more: Citadel is the among hedge funds piling into shorts bets on European banks as record-low rates crush financial firms

SEE ALSO: Emerging markets, M&A, and new services: here are the key trends to watch in the fast-changing payments space

SEE ALSO: Cross-border payments startup TransferWise just inked its first US bank partnerships, including one with digital bank Novo. We chatted with its CEO about the launch, and why an IPO is still far off.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We did a blind taste-test of KFC and Popeyes fried chicken — here's the verdict

A banker revolution against Brexit is brewing in London's leafy stockbroker belt

$
0
0

Boris Johnson, a leadership candidate for Britain's Conservative Party, looks on during his visit at Wisley Garden Centre in Surrey, Britain, June 25, 2019. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls

  • A London hedge-fund manager who lives in the Esher and Walton constituency in the county of Surrey has been hard at work trying to unseat local member of Parliament, Dominic Raab. 
  • Known as the stockbroker belt, Esher and Walton has been stronghold of the Conservative party for decades. Brexit may be changing all that. 
  • "We're looking at a political earthquake here," says Raab's challenger, Monica Harding, in an interview. 
  • "Raab is my MP, but I can't vote for him," an executive at a large US investment bank told Business Insider.

A leafy town on the outskirts of London that's home to some of the City's top bankers and hedge fund managers is an unlikely hotbed of political revolution. 

But one nonetheless may well be underway.

In the Esher and Walton constituency in the county of Surrey – a stronghold of Britain's Conservative party for decades – a London hedge-fund manager has been hard at work volunteering, recruiting neighbors, and donating cash to unseat the local member of Parliament, and Britain's current Foreign Secretary, Dominic Raab. 

The fund manager, who spoke on condition of anonymity citing fears of pro-Brexit backlash from clients and colleagues, is a resident in the district, where property prices average at around £759,000 ($935,000). He balances his efforts, he told Business Insider, with a day job managing about $2 billion from his fund's office in the City.

He is supporting Raab's challenger, Monica Harding of the Liberal Democrats, the only major British political party that has openly said it wants to stop Brexit and remain in the European Union.

Last month, the fund manager said he attended a meeting with economists and strategists at a big investment bank in London. It was supposed to be a roundtable discussion about the global trade war. The subject instead swerved to the fund manager's trip to attend the Liberal Democrat party conference in Bournemouth.

'Cheering around the conference room'

"They started cheering around the conference room," the fund manager said of the reaction to his Bournemouth trip. "It was supposed to be a lunch with China expert. The first third of meeting was everyone grilling me," about the conference.

At stake is the Brexit threat to the fate of the City — London's financial industry is the British economy's cash cow and supports about 1 million jobs. Raab, who also serves as First Secretary of State under Johnson, backs the prime minister's "no deal," leave-at-all-costs stance. It's an unpopular position in Esher and Walton, which backed 'Remain' in the 2016 Brexit referendum by 60% to 40%. 

"We're getting seven new members per day in Esher and Walton, and a huge amount are working in financial services," Harding told Business Insider in an interview. "We've raised, in the past two months, more than we've raised in the last two to three years, and the money is coming from the people you're describing," in hedge funds, banks, brokerages, and other City firms, she said.  

monica harding

Harding said: "It's a huge revolution. We're looking at a political earthquake here."

However, polling numbers aren't quite as bullish. Raab has a majority of somewhere around 25,000 votes and the seat is number 58 on the party's target list for the next election, requiring a swing to the Lib Dems of more than 20% from the last general election. The latest polls suggest that nationally there has only been a swing to the party of around 12%.

It's a long shot by any measure. And as yet there is no date scheduled for an election. 

The stockbroker belt 

Esher and Walton area is part of a ring of towns and villages around London known as the stockbroker belt, due to the large number of City workers who commute into the capital from there.

National polling suggests the Liberal Democrats are likely to have leapfrogged the Labour party, who were the previous main challengers in Raab's seat.

Labour, who were once darlings of City figures during the leadership of former prime minister Tony Blair, now struggle to find support among banker types. Not helping them win over Remainers in the City is the fact that Labour's leader, Jeremy Corbyn, has taken an ambivalent position on Brexit, refusing to say whether his party would campaign for or against leaving the EU in a second referendum.

'They don't want to lose their jobs'

The UK press is rife with headlines about "disaster capitalists" lobbying for Brexit while positioning themselves for profit. But a recent Financial News survey of more than 40 hedge fund managers found that, contrary to public opinion, most don't support Brexit.

"The pound will decline, the economy will have a recession, the banking system will be catatonic, the housing market will crash, the far right will rule, and everything will suck," the hedge-fund manager said.

Harding said the sentiment behind the "huge groundswell" of support for her can be summed up more simply: "They don't want to lose money, and they don't want to lose their jobs."

"In any Brexit, 1,600 jobs will be lost in Esher and Walton, we think it will be more than that," she said. "If they do lose their job, it's taking longer to find a new job. They worry about paying their school fees, or not being able to afford the fees." 

At first, "we didn't even think to campaign in the big gated communities," she said. But since, "floors have flung open and they're inviting me for tea and coffee, and they want to give me money, because they're incensed at the current government."

Britain's Conservative party has held on to power in the area since it was established, but there are signs of shifting sentiment. The Tories lost three seats in a May local election in Elmbridge, in Surrey, including one to Liberal Democrat Ashley Tilling.

Tories 'paid the price'

The Tories "unfortunately paid the price for the chaos that's going on at Westminster — the fact that we've not yet sorted out Brexit," the leader of the Elmbridge Conservatives, James Browne, told SurreyLive after the May vote outcome.

"There were a lot of residents who told us yesterday that they were not going to vote Conservative this year," he said.

The hedge-fund manager echoed the comments: "Opinions are changing," he said, especially among what he called called "low-tax Tories reluctant to defect to the Lib Dems but are appalled at the current government."

"Raab is my MP, but I can't vote for him," a separate London-based executive at a large investment bank told Business Insider, citing the government's handling of Brexit.

Brexit supporters are rife

If it is a revolution, it may be a small, localized one. Elsewhere in the City, Brexit supporters are rife. 

"I know a few Remainiacs in the City who have lost the plot," over what they assume will be catastrophe for the City because of Brexit, another London banker, who does not live in Surrey but in another leafy commuter town, told Business Insider. "But most seem pragmatic and grateful for a bit of volatility. It's tricky to make money in very low-vol markets because nobody trades."

Even if the Lib Dems never take power in Esher and Walton, change is afoot. 

Over a glass of distractingly delicious Rioja at a private members club in Mayfair, the hedge-fund manager described 10 of his neighbors — "die-hard Tories their whole life," he said. "When I advocated a pro Lib Dem stance on a community chat six months ago, these same 10 were berating me because they were Tory."

"Now, they are nicer and put up signs" supporting the Lib Dems, he said. "They didn't apologise, though."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what airlines legally owe you if you're bumped off a flight

Hedge-fund investors want a deal on fees. Managers don't start negotiating until the check hits $120 million.

$
0
0

cash

  • The hedge-fund industry's notoriously high fees have been pushed down as managers have been more willing to negotiate. But talks start only with the guarantee of a big check, according to data from eVestment.
  • To lower management fees, a $119 million check was required on average. To cut performance fees, the cost was even higher — $133 million.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Everyone has a price. For hedge funds, that number includes a lot of zeros. 

Investors in the $3.3 trillion hedge-fund industry have been adamant about pushing down fees, especially as performance has struggled to match the overall market, and large-scale investors like pensions and endowments face pressure to lower costs. 

And hedge funds have mostly come down from the once ubiquitous 2% management fee and 20% performance fee structure, with averages now roughly 1.4% and 16%, respectively, according to Hedge Fund Research. 

But these cuts are often tied to a big commitment, according to data from a new study from the research firm eVestment. Managers require, on average, a $119 million investment to cut management fees. The price goes up to $133 million for performance-fee reductions. That's about double the average investment in hedge funds, according to eVestment. 

Read more: Meet the 8 people with new ideas about data, fees, and tech who are shaking up the $3.2 trillion hedge fund game

"To start really negotiating, you need to be writing checks north of $100 million," said Kris Kwait, co-chief investment officer of Commonfund, a $25 billion manager for endowments, pensions, and foundations. 

Commonfund has pushed the hedge funds in its portfolio to adopt a fee structure with no management fees and high performance fees because "it's really all about how much alpha they can deliver."

"Our most expensive managers are our favorites because they generate the most alpha," Kwait said. 

There is still room in the industry for smaller investors looking for a deal — they'll just have to take a risk to get it.

For instance, family offices are often big backers of emerging managers that don't yet have a track record for pensions or endowments to invest in and can push for a discount, said John Culbertson, the chief investment officer for Context Capital Partners, which invests in hedge funds on the behalf of family offices. 

Read more: What it's like to launch a hedge fund when even the biggest managers are struggling and long-short equity is a 'dirty word'

Culbertson believes investors get too hung up on the front-facing fees and don't look at the whole picture. For example, pensions have told him that they couldn't invest in certain well-known funds because of their fees, despite their long track records of outperforming the market without any correlation to the stock market.

"The industry is, at times, overly focused on gross fees that they pay versus the net returns that they receive," he said.

"There's a bit of an obsession around fees," he added.

But some investors are constrained by fiduciary concerns or political pressures. Wilmington Trust, which runs more than $90 billion and invests in hedge funds, has an "intense focus on keeping fees low" because of the firm's fiduciary duty to investors, Matt Glaser, the firm's head of equity, alternative investments, and manager research, said. 

Fortunately, for an investor as large and old as Wilmington Trust, managers are willing to make it work.

"We have access advantages because of our size and our brand," he said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Octopuses are officially the weirdest animals on Earth

Saba Capital is targeting a unit of Legg Mason in an activist campaign. Another Legg Mason business stands to profit if it's successful.

$
0
0

boaz weinstein

  • Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital, a $1.7 billion hedge fund, has taken activist positions in closed-end funds run by large asset managers like BlackRock and Neuberger Berman with the hopes that new board members will increase the price the funds trade at. 
  • Saba is targeting two closed-end funds run by Western Asset Management, which is owned by the $750 billion manager Legg Mason. 
  • Legg Mason, however, is also backing Saba in its fight against its own asset manager, thanks to its ownership of EnTrust Global, a $20 billion fund of hedge funds and one of Saba's biggest investors. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Boaz Weinstein's latest activism campaign in closed-end funds has affiliates of the $750 billion asset manager Legg Mason on opposite sides of the proxy fight.

Weinstein's Saba Capital, a $1.7 billion hedge fund, is trying to place new board members on two funds run by Western Asset Management, which is owned by the Baltimore-based Legg: the $679 million Western Global High Income fund and the $891 million Western High Income fund.

The fight between the two sides has included the sharp elbows and choice words common of activist campaigns — Western wrote to the stockholders of the Global High Income fund that the fund "is simply the latest fund that [Saba] is targeting for a quick profit."

"Saba Capital has engaged in 16 proxy contests since its inception in 2009 and currently maintains minimal to no holdings in many of the funds it has previously targeted," the letter reads in bold print. Saba, in its Securities and Exchange Commission filing announcing the stake it took in the funds, wrote that Western's board structure — which Saba says protects incumbents — "is strong proof that the board is not acting in the best interests of its shareholders."

Read more: WorldQuant's Igor Tulchinsky just guaranteed his team 75% of last year's performance bonus to soothe nerves as quant funds get slammed

But what is unique to this fight is that those would stand to benefit from a Saba victory include investor EnTrust Global, a $20 billion fund of hedge funds that is owned by Legg Mason. 

Saba's campaigns led to a legal fight with BlackRock, and Neuberger Berman has said that Saba's activism violates the decades-long law that governs retail funds, but this is the first time Weinstein has gotten support from one side of a manager and pushback from another.

In a statement, Legg Mason said that its affiliates were free to invest in what they believe is the best option for their clients. 

Read more: D.E. Shaw is going to trial over the sale of a litigation finance portfolio company, shining a light on a side-pocket deal at the secretive hedge fund firm

"If EnTrust Global sees value in investing in or alongside Saba for their client base, that's an independent decision they would make. Western, also with investment independence, believes that they are proactively taking many steps to manage that fund on behalf of all of the closed end investors that invest in it, and they are making that case in the Saba matter, with shareholders and others," the statement reads. 

EnTrust and Saba declined to comment. 

Weinstein, who was the cohead of credit trading at Deutsche before starting Saba, has made activism in closed-end funds, which trade on exchanges like stocks, a more common occurrence. Asset managers however claim the fund's technique harms retail investors, who are often invested in closed-end funds for the income earned from distributions instead of the discount from the share price. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Sharks aren't the deadliest creatures on Earth. Here are the top 10.

Hedge funds have billions on the line at PG&E's bankruptcy hearing — and equity-holder Seth Klarman is pitted against bond-holder Paul Singer

$
0
0

camp fire destruction

  • Pacific Gas & Electric, the bankrupt California utility that's been found partially responsible for causing two of the state's devastating wildfires, has been a target for dozens of hedge funds. 
  • In a bankruptcy hearing on Monday, a judge will decide between a deal put forth by the equity holders, which would benefit Seth Klarman's Baupost Group, and a settlement from bond holders, led by Paul Singer's Elliott Management and supported by victims of the wildfires. 
  • Major shareholders in the company agreed to an $11 billion Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan in early September that would have paid out funds like Baupost and TPG that held insurance claims at a premium, but that plan no longer has support of wildfire victims.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.  

The final decision in the sprawling multi-billion-dollar bankruptcy of Pacific Gas & Electric will make some well-known hedge fund managers very happy, and ruin the years-long work of others. 

The California utility that was found partially responsible for some of the state's recent massive wildfires had the backing of its major shareholders — including David Abrams' Abrams Capital, John Paulson's hedge fund, Fidelity, and dozens of other managers — for an $11 billion Chapter 11 plan that would have paid out insurance claims at a rate that would make Seth Klarman's Baupost Group hundreds of millions.

Baupost owns more than $3 billion in insurance claims that the Boston-based manager would have been paid back 59 cents on the dollar for under the bankruptcy plan — double the amount of what the firm paid for some of the claims.  

But the plan has been challenged by another high-powered group of hedge funds and asset managers, led by Paul Singer's Elliott Management and Pacific Investment Management Company, who own the utility's bonds. They have put forward a bankruptcy proposal where the group of bondholders would pump $29.2 billion into the company to take control of it — and basically push the equity-holders out of the equation. 

One important group representing the victims of the wildfires has made its allegiance known. It has sided with bondholders, under a plan in which $14.5 billion would go to those who lost homes, cars, and loved ones in the natural disasters. 

The company, hoping to fend off the challenge from Elliott's bondholder group, said late last week that it had lined up more than $34 billion in debt financing commitments from banks like JPMorgan, Bloomberg reported.  

The latest iteration of the saga will play out on Monday, when Judge Dennis Montali is set to rule on whether both plans would be able to move ahead. Below is a rundown of the funds that will be hanging on his every word. 

The equity heavy-hitters

Two of the biggest equity-holders in the company — hedge funds Abrams Capital and Knighthead Capital — own nearly 40 million shares of the utility between them, and have formed a separate group known as the Jones Day group, as they are being advised by the well-known law firm.

Originally, the group used to include Redwood Capital, and the three funds were looking at returns in the hundreds of millions in April after the stock jumped up to $23 a share on news of a restructuring proposal. The stock is currently trading at less than half of that. 

Abrams Capital is run by David Abrams, a former protege of Seth Klarman when Abrams worked at Baupost. Now, Abrams and Knighthead are the leading proponents of the bankruptcy proposal that would net Klarman hundreds of millions thanks to the insurance payouts. 



The rest of the stockholders

The stockholders that are not a part of the Abrams-Knighthead duo include some big shots in their own right — like billionaire John Paulson, whose firm owns more than 2 million shares.

Other funds include mutual fund giant Fidelity, D.E. Shaw, BlueMountain, HBK, Centerbridge Capital and roughly two dozen more.

The biggest shareholders other than Abrams Capital, according to bankruptcy filings, are Baupost Group, which owns 24.5 million shares, and Anchorage Capital, which owns more than 21 million shares. 

See more: $21 billion hedge fund BlueMountain Capital has upped its bet on PG&E, the utility that's crashed 60% since the California wildfires. Here's why.



Baupost's big bet and the other owners of insurance claims

Baupost may have taken some hits on its large equity stake in the California utility, but, if the equity-holders' plan goes through, the firm will make hundreds of millions on the insurance payout.

The manager led by billionaire Seth Klarman owns $3.4 billion in subrogation claims, according to bankruptcy filings, more than any insurer or manager. Private equity firm TPG Sixth Street Partners owns nearly $400 million in claims, while insurers like State Farm and Farmers Insurance Exchange own billions each in claims. 

Klarman has added to the amount of claims Baupost owns since the first quarter. Records for California agencies show Baupost owned $2.5 billion in claims at the end of March — which is $900 million less than what the firm owns now. 

 



Elliott, PIMCO, and the wildfire victims

The fight is between asset classes — bond-holders versus equity-holders. And the bond-holders are not lacking for star power. 

Leading the fight for the bond-holders is Elliott Management, the $38 billion hedge fund founded by Paul Singer. The firm owns $1.4 billion in senior utility notes and is well-known for its prowess in the courtroom. 

Other firms include mutual fund managers like PIMCO, which owns $2.1 billion in senior utility notes, and hedge funds like Dan Loeb's Third Point, Ken Griffin's Citadel, and Howard Marks' Oaktree.

Citi, Deutsche, Capital Group, Apollo, Angelo Gordon, Farallon and many others are also a part of the high-powered bondholders group that is hoping to give $14 billion to victims and $11 billion to insurance agencies, and give bondholders a controlling stake in the company when it emerges from bankruptcy. 

PG&E accused Elliott and the bondholders of "attempting to manipulate and profit from the chapter 11 process," when the plan was laid out at the end of September. 

"The Elliott proposal would enrich bondholders by paying them interest well in excess of what is required by law, resulting in billions in unnecessary costs being borne by PG&E customers," PG&E's statement reads. 

The bondholders, though, have the most sympathetic group in the bankruptcy on their side: the wildfire victims. After supporting the equity-holders at first, a group representing the victims now supports the bondholders' plan, which pays victims billions more than the equityholders' plan. 



BlueMountain is shuttering its flagship hedge fund, and cofounder Stephen Siderow is leaving. The struggling firm will be almost entirely out of the hedge-fund game.

$
0
0

Andrew Feldstein BlueMountain

  • BlueMountain is winding down its 16-year-old flagship fund, the $2.5 billion BlueMountain Credit Alternatives Fund, to focus on its collateralized-loan-obligations business for its new corporate owner, Assured Guaranty. 
  • BlueMountain cofounder Stephen Siderow will also leave the firm at the end of the year, the firm said in a statement. 
  • The manager, which just a year ago was running several different hedge-fund strategies, has pulled back from the space in just 10 months.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

BlueMountain — which has been a major player in the hedge-fund game for more than 15 years — is winding down its flagship fund, BlueMountain Credit Alternatives. 

Affiliated Managers Group recently sold its majority stake in the struggling firm to the bond insurer Assured Guaranty, which also purchased the remaining equity in the manager. BlueMountain closing the credit fund marks a huge retreat from the highly competitive hedge-fund industry. 

The credit fund, which launched in 2003 and manages about $2.5 billion, was the centerpiece of a hedge-fund portfolio that used to include a systematic long-short equity fund and a discretionary stock-picking fund that the manager also shuttered this year. With the $160 million sale to Assured Guaranty, BlueMountain is focusing its efforts on its CLO line, which already manages billions.

"Consistent with the firm's investment strengths, BlueMountain plans to launch new
strategies aligned with the firm's focus on collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) and structured finance.
Such strategies will include the areas of CLO equity tranches, as well as asset-backed securities focused
on private debt investments in specialty finance companies and assets," the manager said in a statement. 

The flagship fund will be wound down completely by the fourth quarter of 2020. The statement said the fund had delivered 177% cumulative net returns since 2003, with an annualized return of 6.7% after fees. A source familiar with the situation told Business Insider that about 8% of the assets within the fund were from BlueMountain insiders — about $200 million. 

Cofounder Stephen Siderow, who launched the firm alongside investment head Andrew Feldstein, will also leave by the end of the year, the firm said in the statement. 

"This is the right time for me to consider new opportunities across my business and philanthropic interests. I'm delighted to see BlueMountain begin a new chapter as part of Assured Guaranty, and I'm confident in their vision for the business. I feel very fortunate to have had the opportunity to build BlueMountain with Andrew, whom I consider to be one of the great investors of our generation," Siderow said in the statement.

Press releases after BlueMountain's sale had noted that Siderow would be a president of BlueMountain, while Feldstein would become the chief investment officer of Assured Guaranty's new asset-management unit. 

Read more: $21 billion hedge fund BlueMountain Capital has upped its bet on PG&E, the utility that's crashed 60% since the California wildfires. Here's why.

BlueMountain, known for its credit-investing prowess, struggled in the hedge-fund game once it expanded beyond its core strategy. While Feldstein is widely respected for his bets against his former employer JPMorgan in its London Whale trade — which netted BlueMountain hundreds of millions in returns — the firm could not keep up with multistrategy behemoths like Citadel, Millennium, and Point72, despite investing in talent and technology to support equity strategies. 

Affiliated Managers Group, the onetime majority investor in BlueMountain, had to write off a $415 million expense earlier this year because of BlueMountain's struggles, though AMG executives said the firm was on the path to profitability after cutting the equity strategies to focus on its credit roots. But then the firm's head of fundamental credit, Omar Vaishnavi, was reported to be leaving the firm, despite recently representing the firm onstage at a conference

The firm's expansion into CLOs made it an attractive buy for Assured. An investor presentation by Assured on BlueMountain after the acquisition was announced focused less on the firm's hedge funds and more on the CLO line that doubled to about $12 billion over the past five years. 

"Continue to issue multiple CLOs per year in both the US and Europe," the presentation said in a section titled "Go Forward Focus." 

The Credit Alternatives Fund has struggled to keep up with this year, losing money in a year when the average hedge fund has returned nearly 7%. Records show the fund hasn't returned more than 6.1% in a year over the past five years. The manager plans to continue to run its $580 million Global Volatility hedge fund, a source close to the firm said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What El Chapo is really like, according to the wife of one his closest henchman


We talked to 24 people about the hedge-fund wunderkind at Elliott who wants to shake up AT&T. Here's why management should be terrified.

$
0
0

att campaign 2x1

  • The latest campaign for the Wall Street hedge fund Elliott Management is a big one, taking on the well-known American staple AT&T. The man in charge of pushing the massive company to make the changes the $38 billion fund sees fit is 39-year-old Jesse Cohn, the billionaire Paul Singer's right-hand man. 
  • Other than Singer himself, Cohn is the person most responsible for the transformation of Elliott from a distressed-situations specialist to the sprawling institutional behemoth it is today, with a separate private-equity arm and billions ready to be deployed for a new activist campaign.
  • Cohn's tactics have included shrewdness and aggression in the 100-plus campaigns the Long Island, New York, native has run for Singer.
  • Business Insider talked to more than two dozen of his colleagues, competitors, detractors, and friends, who said Elliott's rise mimicked Cohn's own personal rise in the firm and in corporate America.
  • Sources told Business Insider that Cohn, and Elliott's activism as a whole, were transforming as the firm positions itself as a long-term investor.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Jesse Cohn has been behind some of the ugliest shareholder tussles and boardroom battles in history during his 15 years at Paul Singer's Elliott Management.

His strategy of purchasing stock en masse and then demanding an overhaul of a company's business has provoked f-bombs from the Detroit businessman Peter Karmanos and paranoia from Athenahealth founder Jonathan Bush — the cousin of George W. Bush — that Cohn had him followed and photographed.

Now the 39-year-old — who is hooked on HBO's "Succession"— is setting his sights on his biggest target yet: the telecom giant AT&T.

Those who have worked on the other side of some of his 100-plus campaigns at Elliott say his track record should strike terror in the hearts of AT&T management, pointing to an uncanny ability to affect change at companies, including layoffs, cost cutting, and ousters of CEOs.

"I wouldn't want to be [AT&T management]," one longtime adviser to companies' boards of directors said. 

In September, Cohn sent 23 pages to AT&T's board of directors, criticizing everything from the company's failed attempt to acquire T-Mobile in 2011 to its $67 billion acquisition of DirecTV — a move, he wrote, that produced "damaging results." 

At the same time, Cohn proposed cuts, saying AT&T's organization was "unnecessarily complicated and inefficient, including a management layer that can be streamlined by reducing spans and layers and title proliferation."

Only a week later, AT&T's CEO Randall Stephenson publicly addressed Cohn's observations at a New York conference, acknowledging some of what Cohn outlined "makes a lot of sense." And, according to The Wall Street Journal, AT&T has begun exploring a split from DirecTV. 

An institutional Elliott

The saga unfolding at AT&T is Cohn's latest work, set on a much grander stage than he has ever stood — a new peak for the $38 billion hedge fund's top lieutenant, because of the company's size and influence, that he's been building to.

A review of his career should be required reading for AT&T's board: From falling into finance as someone who didn't know what he wanted to do in his early 20s to becoming Paul Singer's attack dog on some of his most influential campaigns, Cohn has developed a reputation as a feared investor with the means to change America's blue-chip corporations.

Conversations with more than two dozen of his colleagues, competitors, detractors, and friends also reveal an evolution. Cohn has developed a more diplomatic touch, as his targets have become larger and overhauls need approval by long-term shareholders, such as BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. 

People close to Cohn say he has gradually developed relationships with these large Wall Street investors, who hold key votes in any contest over how a large company is managed. He's on the boards of public companies, like Citrix and eBay, that he led campaigns on, as well as those of private companies that Elliott's private-equity arm has bought outright. 

Chris Cernich, who once advised these large investors on how they should vote on some of Elliott's biggest proxy fights, including with the oil and gas company Hess, went so far as to say Cohn is perhaps the perfect exemplar of how Elliott has become the most institutional of activist investors.

Elliott "is one of the only activist funds that is not an alter ego of the founder," he said, as it maintains a corporate structure, with nine management-committee members around Singer. At the same time, its investments have increasingly been packaged as a play for the long-term good of a corporation.

This gives Cohn even more influence when he goes after a company like AT&T. 

Cohn almost didn't join Elliott

Fifteen years ago, Cohn almost didn't join Elliott. 

After spending two years on Morgan Stanley's mergers and acquisitions team, Cohn began to look for hedge funds to join, accepting an offer from Elliott, which was then focused only on distressed situations. Cohn then later received an offer from a more "established fund," according to Ray McGuire, his boss at Morgan who is now a vice chairman at Citigroup.

It came as no surprise that Cohn had options. 

Originally a native of the Long Island hamlet Baldwin, New York, Cohn was a computer whiz kid in his youth, attending programming camps in the summer and earning a certification from the software programmer Novell for his coding abilities before he could drive. (Years later, he pushed Novell to sell itself for more than $2 billion to Attachmate, where Cohn joined the board.)

He went to the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where he was a part of a literary society, and graduated in 2002, when he started working for McGuire and the prolific Wall Street dealmaker Paul Taubman at Morgan Stanley. There he helped make connections in the software and technology space that he eventually made his mark on at Elliott, sources said.

At Morgan, McGuire said Cohn and fellow analyst Arta Tabaee, now a managing director at Clearlake Capital Group, were always around, constantly popping into his office with new ideas. McGuire described Cohn as fearless and "summa smart."

The idea of joining Elliott ultimately prevailed. After talking his decision over with McGuire, Cohn decided to stick with his gut.

"I think that was an early defining moment for Jesse, to honor his commitment," McGuire, who is still in touch with Cohn today, said.

In the subsequent years, the triathlon enthusiast would build Elliott's activism unit from scratch, with a focus and energy that is unnerving to opponents and endearing to colleagues. He finds it difficult sitting still at his desk and often needs to take a break to walk through Central Park, according to those who have worked with him, bringing colleagues with him to strategize about their next investment.

The birth of Elliott's activism

Cohn started Elliott's activism unit in 2005 with a small investment in the switch maker and Cisco competitor Enterasys Networks, which he pressured to sell, doubling Elliott's investment in the process. 

The initial investment in Enterasys was only $15 million, but to Cohn, it was huge, according to people close to him. He took a shine to hunting down the inner details of a business, cold calling customers, employees, and engineers in the switch-making industry for insights. The company had loyal customers, but its products weren't reaching enough people, he concluded.

His career purpose began to take shape: He loved improving companies.

Soon, a whole swath of other small tech companies came in to Cohn's sights. He thought they had compelling products, but their stocks were underperforming. So he amassed stakes in their businesses, approached their management, and told them they were doing it wrong. Oftentimes, it wasn't pretty.

In 2006, Harry Knowles was the CEO of the bar-code systems maker Metrologic Instruments. After Metrologic underperformed that year, Knowles said Cohn approached him in an annual shareholder meeting and told him he would have to step aside and sell the company.

"He said, 'Hey, let me talk to you,'" Knowles said. "You don't have any choice."

Knowles, then in his 70s, thought he was getting old for the job. He cooperated with Cohn in selling Metrologic to the private-equity shop Francisco Partners and Elliott for $440 million. The newly installed owners hired another CEO to replace Knowles, who, in turn, fired Knowles' close friends and jettisoned business lines that relied on Knowles' personal involvement. The process was "painful," Knowles said.

It wouldn't be the last time Cohn's pressure on companies would contribute to the fraying of relationships among company management.

By 2012, Cohn set his sights on Compuware, a Detroit-based software company created by the former Carolina Hurricanes owner Pete Karmanos. Karmanos was on his way out of the company after ceding leadership and ready for a happy retirement. But after Elliott bought a stake and pressed for layoffs and cost cutting, he and his newly appointed CEO stopped getting along.

As Cohn bought more and more of the company's stock, multiple expletive-laced arguments broke out between Karmanos and his chosen successor, Bob Paul, over whether to cut costs, including his own retirement parties that would have cost $1.5 million and involved renting out the Detroit City Airport, according to a lawsuit later lodged by Karmanos against his fellow board members.

Karmanos' temperament soured more when Cohn ratcheted up the stakes and made a bid for the Compuware business as a whole at the end of 2012, phoning up Paul and telling him the bid would hit the press in 30 seconds, according to court documents. 

After the board declined the bid, Karmanos told a crowd of several hundred people at a business conference that if he were still in charge, he "would tell the hedge fund to go f--- themselves," according to a lengthy account of the matter in the Detroit Free Press.

Testimony from board members in Karmanos' lawsuit detailed an aggressive approach by Cohn.

They said Cohn had thick files of personal information on each board member with details on which jobs their spouses had and schools their kids attended. He had the files laid out on a conference-room table when the board met with Cohn in Elliott's New York office. Karmanos has said he believed it played a part in intimidating his board into eventually selling.

'We're the aggressors'

Cohn's reputation as an attack dog intensified during his campaign against the healthcare-technology company Athenahealth.

A feature story in The New Yorker detailed his campaign last year against Athenahealth's former CEO Jonathan Bush, who said an anonymous Instagram user had taken pictures of him with a female friend and sent them to his wife. He wondered if Elliott was behind it — something the firm denies. Bush resigned from the company after a London-based reporter discovered details of domestic abuse in divorce filings from more than a decade ago. 

Elliott has repeatedly denied the allegations in the lawsuit and past media reports on the firm's tactics, including any insinuation that it placed the story about Bush's history of domestic violence. But sources said the stories played to the firm's benefit. Boards and lawyers are reticent to fight a firm with Elliott's reputation. The stock price of companies Elliott takes a stake in often jump when a campaign is announced. 

"Part of Elliott's story to their investors and to the media is 'we're the aggressors,'" said J.B. Heaton, a managing member of One Hat Research and a former lawyer that worked on activism cases who has studied activism's effectiveness.

Cohn's ability to create change within an organization has been rewarded by Singer.

A couple years ago, Cohn paid $30 million for a penthouse in Manhattan's financial district that spans 6,000 square feet, according to media reports at the time.

Private-equity powers 

One weapon in Cohn's arsenal that would make him even more effective came in 2015: a private-equity fund Cohn created within Elliott, called Evergreen Coast Capital. 

The very nature of private equity — buying a company whole and improving its performance over as many as five years — was a departure from Cohn's reputation for seeking immediate change. 

The fund was started by Cohn after Elliott lost out on a bid for a company in which it was an investor: Riverbed Technologies, which Thoma Bravo and other investors bought in 2014. The fund has put billions of dollars to work, taking companies like Gigamon, Travelport, and Athenahealth private. 

With a private-equity fund at Cohn's disposal, he could walk into a boardroom meeting as a shareholder to talk about a company's performance, and then swiftly pivot, turning the conversation into a dialogue about a possible sale of the company to Elliott, one person familiar with his campaigns said.

At least one instance where this happened was the sale of LifeLock Inc., a consumer-protection company, which, after an initial meeting with Cohn in 2016, was sold to another company where Elliott was a significant investor: Symantec Corp. 

What AT&T can expect

At AT&T, of course, executives don't need to worry about a buyout. The company is too large to be acquired outright. 

Instead, Cohn is seeking to extract concessions from the company's management to conduct its business differently, including halting plans for any merger and acquisition activity, outsourcing work, and closing "redundant stores." 

 The labor-union Communications Workers of America is fighting back against the proposals.

"Our position is that this business strategy will harm local communities that rely on the good jobs and advanced communications networks that flow from AT&T investment," Christopher Shelton, the union's president, wrote in a letter to the AT&T board. 

Cohn has joined the boards of companies he has pressed in the past, such as Citrix and eBay. While it's unknown if he would end up on the AT&T board, Cohn's current and former board-member colleagues say he isn't resistant to compromise once he's able to get a better understanding of the company.

Fred Salerno, the chair of the cybersecurity company Akamai's board, said Cohn had originally wanted to fire the CEO and sell the company but relented after meeting with executives. 

"He's proven himself to be a very collaborative board member," said Bob Calderoni, who leads Citrix's board, which Cohn has been on the board for four years. 

Calderoni believes the time on boards has helped Cohn learn that "operating a company is different than investing in a company."

"He's willing to listen and learn," he said.

Lately, Cohn has been consuming a steady diet of literature, from Bob Iger's book "The Ride of a Lifetime," which offers a window into how Igor ran the Walt Disney Co. as CEO, to "Dreyer's English," a book about writing by a top editor at Random House. A person close to Cohn said the latter book influenced his wordsmithing of the AT&T letter. 

But while Cohn may be academic and cerebral, he hasn't lost the assertive nature for which he's so well known, people close to him said. 

Some are not so quick to believe Cohn has turned a new leaf at all. One person who has represented companies said that while Cohn is easier to negotiate with in producing quick settlements, he doesn't for a minute think anyone who gets in his way won't suffer his wrath. 

"The idea that he's turned a new leaf and he's a nice, kinder Jesse?" the person asked, considering the notion before then quickly dismissing it.

"I don't know. Go read The New Yorker article."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Most hurricanes that hit the US and Caribbean islands come from the same exact spot in the world

Meet the 39-year-old hedge fund star most people have never heard of who bought a $30 million penthouse on Wall Street

$
0
0

30 Park Place Place Penthouse

Jesse Cohn does not like to sit still — which is a good thing since the 39-year-old activist investor wakes up before the sun to train for triathlons and then goes into Elliott Management's midtown offices to construct campaigns against some of the biggest companies in the world.

The latest company to find itself in Cohn's crosshairs is AT&T, the media conglomerate that is an American staple. Cohn has steadily built the activism unit of the now-$38 billion Elliott to the point where he can take on a company like AT&T and be favored to win. He's led more than 100 activist campaigns, sat on the boards of companies like Citrix and eBay, and been labeled Elliott's "enfant terrible" by Fortune magazine. 

Read more: We talked to 24 people about the hedge-fund wunderkind at Elliott who wants to shake up AT&T. Here's why management should be terrified.

The work has been rewarded by Paul Singer, the billionaire founder of Elliott and Republican super donor. Cohn bought a $30 million penthouse in Manhattan's financial district that is 50 floors above a Four Seasons Hotel, according to property records and past media reports. 

In a tour of the building in 2016, Business Insider found that residents at 30 Park Place have access to "a fitness center, conservatory, screening room, children's play room, dining room with separate catering kitchen and access to the hotel restaurants, and two double-height loggias."

Residents can also access a shared 75-foot swimming pool with the Four Seasons, a spa, salon, ballroom, meeting rooms, and business center. The development offers some of the best views of the Freedom Tower in the city. 

To learn more about Cohn and his meteoric rise, click here to read the full profile. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Octopuses are officially the weirdest animals on Earth

Jonathan Soros is pumping $300 million into a new hedge fund run by one of his father's former portfolio managers

$
0
0

Jonathan Soros

  • Courtney Carson, the former Soros Fund Management distressed-debt head, has gotten $300 million from Jonathan Soros' JS Capital for his new hedge fund, Hein Park, sources told Business Insider.
  • Carson left Soros Fund Management in May, one of a dozen money managers who have departed since Dawn Fitzpatrick took over as chief investment officer, Bloomberg reported.
  • Carson previously worked for Deutsche Bank and Richard Brennan's Camulos Capital and did several stints at Soros Fund Management.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Jonathan Soros is backing one of his dad's former portfolio managers. 

The younger Soros' JS Capital is investing $300 million in Courtney Carson's new fund, named Hein Park after the historic district in Carson's hometown of Memphis, Tennessee, sources told Business Insider.

Carson left Soros Fund Management in May after running the firm's distressed-credit book since the beginning of 2016. Bloomberg reported that his team would stay at Soros Fund Management for the rest of the year. 

Carson, a graduate of Notre Dame and an alum of Deutsche Bank and Richard Brennan's Camulos Capital, is one of about a dozen money managers that have left George Soros' family office since new Chief Investment Officer Dawn Fitzpatrick took over. 

But Carson's clearly kept in touch with the family after his departure, as JS Capital is now lined up as one of the biggest backers for his new fund. It is unclear when the fund will launch or how much it hopes to begin trading with. 

Other investors who Soros' sons have backed include Santiago Jariton, who started Emerging Variant in 2017 after working for George Soros for more than a decade. Both Jonathan and Robert Soros invested in Jariton's new fund, according to media reports

JS Capital declined to comment. Carson did not respond to requests for comment. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Jeff Bezos is worth over $160 billion — here's how the world's richest man makes and spends his money

South Korea's largest hedge fund freezes $710 million as investors try to pull funds

$
0
0

south korean trader won

  • Lime Asset Management — South Korea's largest hedge fund — has frozen a total of $710 million in withdrawals as investors rush to pull their cash from the firm, Bloomberg reported. 
  • The firm, which oversees about $4.1 billion, said it's struggling to sell assets fast enough to pay out investors, the report found.
  • The investor redemptions began after the firm confirmed last that it was under investigation by Korean financial authorities over investments in convertible bonds. 
  • Visit the Business Insider homepage for more stories.

South Korea's largest hedge fund has frozen a total of $710 million in assets as investors rush to pull their capital from the firm.  

According to Bloomberg, Lime Asset Management froze another $210 million in funds on Monday after locking up about $500 million in assets last week. 

The firm said its freezing redemptions because it can't sell assets quickly enough to meet investor demand for withdrawals, Bloomberg reported. 

"Due to the recent drop in the Kosdaq market and also declines in stocks of companies we've invested in, it became hard to obtain liquidity by converting the bonds into the stocks as we planned," CEO Won Jong-Jun said during a press briefing, according to Bloomberg

Investors began pulling funds from Lime — which oversees about $4.1 billion in assets — last week after the firm confirmed earlier this week that its under investigation by Korean financial authorities over investments in convertible bonds. 

Convertible bonds allow investors to convert their investment into a specified number of shares. An official at South Korea's Financial Supervisory Service told Bloomberg last week that its looking into whether Lime bought convertible bonds from zombie companies. 

Read more: Nobel laureate Robert Shiller forewarned investors about the dot-com and housing bubbles. Now he tells us which irrational market behaviors have him most worried.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How Area 51 became the center of alien conspiracy theories

Hedge funds pumped more than $200 million into a family of crypto funds last quarter even though performance tanked

$
0
0

A token of the virtual currency Bitcoin is seen placed on a monitor that displays binary digits in this illustration picture, December 8, 2017. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

  • Grayscale Investments, which runs 10 crypto-linked investment trusts, had more than a quarter of a billion dollars' worth of inflows in the third quarter, with an overwhelming majority coming from hedge funds. 
  • Crypto and crypto-linked products were hit hard over the same period, with bitcoin's price falling by 25% in the quarter.
  • Grayscale launched a marketing campaign in May to urge investors to swap gold for crypto in their portfolios.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

Bitcoin got crushed. Hedge funds didn't care.

That's the story of the third quarter, according to Grayscale Investments. The $2.2 billion asset manager runs 10 crypto-linked products.

According to the firm's recently released flow numbers, last quarter was the most money the firm has seen flowing into its products ever — with $254.9 million in total.

And the overwhelming majority of those assets — 84% — came from hedge funds. That's a marked increase from the first quarter of this year, when hedge funds represented just 56% of the flows. 

"There is an across-the-board sentiment that digital currencies is an asset class that is not going away," Michael Sonnenshein, the managing director of Grayscale, said.

Read more: Jonathan Soros is pumping $300 million into a new hedge fund run by one of his father's former portfolio managers

What's notable is that hedge funds were pumping in money while the most popular currency, bitcoin, was hit hard. Bitcoin fell by 25% in the three months ending September 30 but has still outperformed nearly every asset class this year, with the price more than doubling since the beginning of 2019 despite the third-quarter woes.

Grayscale products likewise slumped in the quarter, with each one losing at least 30% of its value, but Sonnenshein believes hedge funds have noticed the bigger picture. For instance, the firm's biggest offering — a bitcoin-linked trust — has notched returns of more than 5,500% since it was launched in 2013. 

"They're looking for alternatives for new sources of alpha," he said, attributing the volume of flows partially to the firm's marketing campaign, which it launched in May, that implored investors to drop gold in favor of crypto in their portfolios.

Hedge funds, despite posting their best start to the year since 2013, with an average return of 4.9%, have still struggled to outperform the general market, pushing investors to demand greater transparency and more lenient fee structures. Crypto, Sonnenshein said, has been seen as a way for them to boost returns.

"They're having a hard time finding an investment opportunity with a better risk-return profile right now than bitcoin," he said.

Read more: The clock is about to strike midnight on a hedge fund's $1 million bet on bitcoin soaring above $50,000

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Jeff Bezos is worth over $160 billion — here's how the world's richest man makes and spends his money

$8.8 billion ExodusPoint's head of data strategy is out, but the hedge fund's 15-person data team has no plans to slow down

$
0
0

Chris Petrescu

  • ExodusPoint lost its head of data strategy, Chris Petrescu, last week, sources told Business Insider. 
  • Petrescu was in charge of finding alternative datasets for the hedge fund's portfolio managers to use, and he was a frequent panelist at data conferences. 
  • Exodus, Michael Gelband's $8.8 billion hedge fund, still has a 15-person data team, a person close to the firm told Business Insider.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Chris Petrescu, ExodusPoint's head of data strategy, left the $8.8 billion hedge fund last week, sources told Business Insider.

Petrescu was in charge of finding alternative datasets to buy for the firm's many portfolio-management teams, and he was a frequent panelist at high-profile data conferences. The firm still has a 15-person data team run by Anil Chandroth, the head of data science and Petrescu's former boss, and the team's strategy remains unchanged, according to a source close to the firm.

Exodus declined to comment. Petrescu did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 

Read more: Hedge funds' secret sauce is obscure data like satellite images. Here's how the people in charge of spending millions on this data find the stuff worth buying.

Hedge funds have turned to alternative data to boost returns, which has spurred an explosion of startups. The industry tracker AlternativeData.org says there are 445 alternative-data vendors — a huge leap from 10 years ago, when there were just over 100 vendors. 

To filter through the now overwhelming number of data streams for sale, hedge funds employ data buyers like Petrescu to find data that is unique and proven to generate returns. At conferences like BattleFin, where vendors are hawking their products, these data buyers can have dozens of meetings in a day on the search for game-changing data. 

As data has grown in prominence, the data buyers have also grown in stature. A lawsuit between WorldQuant and Third Point a couple years ago revealed that Dan Loeb's firm was paying the data-strategy head Matthew Ober $2 million a year to woo him away from Igor Tulchinsky's firm.

Read more: Nasdaq-owned alt-data seller Quandl just hired BlueMountain's former data buyer to get inside hedge fund clients' heads

Petrescu also worked at WorldQuant from 2014 to 2017 as a data strategist before leading data strategy for Exodus. The $8.8 billion hedge fund's first year of trading underwhelmed, returning less than 1% in the second half of 2018. 

This year, the firm has returned about 4% through the end of September, trailing multistrategy rivals like Point72, Balyasny, Citadel, and Millennium, Gelband's old firm, but it made money in last month — 0.4% — when many big names were hit by the dramatic swings in oil and momentum stocks

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The Navy has its own Area 51 and it's right in the middle of the Bahamas

Maverick Capital's human stock pickers are shining, but quant strategies at Lee Ainslie's $8.8 billion fund are in the red and lagging their peers

$
0
0

Lee Ainslie

  • The $8.8 billion hedge fund Maverick Capital's fundamental fund line — which includes three funds with different amounts of leverage — has beaten the average hedge fund through the first three quarters of 2019, while the firm's quant funds have lost money.
  • The two quant funds have lost 5.9% and 9.8% through the end of September. The average quant fund has had positive returns of 6.25%, according to Hedge Fund Research.
  • Human stock pickers have been leading the pack this year, with big names like Bill Ackman and David Einhorn posting big numbers, while quants like Winton and Systematica have lagged behind.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Maverick Capital's long-running fundamental stock-picking funds have outperformed peers in 2019. Meanwhile, the $8.8 billion manager's quant strategies are just hoping to break even by the end of the year.

An up-and-down first half of the year for quant funds — when managers like Winton, Systematica, and Renaissance Technologies posted returns that veered from mediocre to poor — was made worse in September, when a massive shift in momentum stocks hit many computer-driven funds. An investor document from Lee Ainslie's Dallas-based firm shows Maverick was not spared. 

The document says that the two quant funds at Maverick, which manage a combined $930 million, lost 3.7% and 5.7% in the third quarter, and are down 5.9% and 9.8% for the year. That comes as the average quant has returned 6.25% through the end of September, according to Hedge Fund Research, less than the 8% return for the average equity hedge fund on the year.

Read more: Izzy Englander just landed a quant team that was managing hundreds of millions for billionaire Michael Platt

But the firm's fundamental funds, which have been running since Ainslie started the firm in the early 1990s, have all made money this year. The Maverick LDC, the Maverick Levered, and the Maverick Long Enhanced posted returns of 10.4%, 20.4%, and 23.4%, respectively, through the end of September. Together, the three funds manage over $3.8 billion.

Maverick appears to have avoided the hits several of its stock-picking peers took when momentum crashed, as all of its fundamental funds were positive for the third quarter. Comparatively, Tiger Cub Coatue fell by 5%, thanks to the crash, and Steve Cohen's Point72 lost money because of the out-of-the-blue market shift, according to Bloomberg.

Ainslie's quant funds have not matched the yearly returns of the firm's stock-picking strategies so far, according to the document. In the four years the two quant strategies have been running, annualized returns for both sit below 6%. The lowest annualized return for the fundamental strategies is 10.4%. 

A spokesman for Maverick declined to comment.

Read more: WorldQuant's Igor Tulchinsky just guaranteed his team 75% of last year's performance bonus to soothe nerves as quant funds get slammed

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We did a blind taste-test of KFC and Popeyes fried chicken — here's the verdict


AT&T survived round one with activist hedge fund Elliott. Now, the company has to fill a board seat and weigh spin-offs under the fund's close watch.

$
0
0

att campaign 4x3

  • Elliott's $3.2 billion stake in AT&T has pushed the telecom giant to add two new board members and split the chairman and CEO roles for Randall Stephenson's successor. The influential hedge fund is not done, though.
  • Sources tell Business Insider that one of the new board members has not been picked yet and Stephenson's one-time successor-in-waiting, John Stankey, is auditioning for Stephenson's job, though has not been guaranteed the role. 
  • The firm is also reviewing its portfolio of companies, according to a statement on Monday, with the possibility of a sale for some of AT&T's big brands, like DirecTV.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

AT&T didn't waste time reaching an agreement with Paul Singer's activist hedge fund, Elliott Management.

Just a little over seven weeks after the $38 billion fund announced its campaign with a $3.2 billion investment in AT&T, the telecom giant has acquiesced on several of the fund's demands. Chief among them is a cost-cutting plan, to be led by former cable executive Bill Morrow, the addition of two new members to the company's board, and a review of the firm's sprawling list of portfolio companies.

But the lion's share of the work still remains. One of the two new board members has not been selected, sources tell Business Insider, and Elliott is pushing for someone with a media background. And while a review of the portfolio may bring about a sale of a brand like DirecTV, nothing is guaranteed, especially if the market is uninterested in AT&T's undesired pieces. 

"There are no sacred cows," said Randall Stephenson, AT&T's CEO, on the firm's earnings call Monday morning about the firm's list of portfolio companies. 

See more: We talked to 24 people about the hedge-fund wunderkind at Elliott who wants to shake up AT&T. Here's why management should be terrified.

Sources familiar with the back-and-forth between Stephenson and the hedge fund, whose campaign was led by its head of U.S. activism, Jesse Cohn, said Stephenson was open to the hedge fund's suggestions despite some initial skepticism of Elliott. 

Stephenson agreed that his successor as CEO would not hold the chairman role as well, like he currently does, for example, and has opened up the search for his successor beyond his hand-picked candidate, president and chief operating officer John Stankey, who will be removed as the CEO of WarnerMedia once a replacement is found. Elliott is pushing for an executive with more media experience to fill that WarnerMedia role. 

Despite Stephenson's acceptance of many of Elliott's proposals, AT&T still has to execute. A review of portfolio companies does not necessarily mean a sale of certain brands, though it is expected to from Elliott's side.

"There's a lot of low-hanging fruit here, like it's almost touching the ground," one person close with Elliott said.

AT&T already sold its Puerto Rico operation to Liberty Latin America for nearly $2 billion earlier this month.

While one new board member is already agreed upon by AT&T and Elliott — and will join the board later this week — the second new member is still unknown. The hedge fund is pushing for someone with media experience, which it identified as a weak spot given the job now involves overseeing operations like HBO. 

The second new board member will start at the firm in 2020, though the company could look drastically different by then, depending on what happens over the next two months.

"There's going to be a lot more announcements, a lot more markers, coming out in the next few months," the person close to Elliott said.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

An SEC official is siding with big asset managers that say hedge funds like Saba Capital should be banned from taking activist stakes in closed-end funds

$
0
0

robert jackson SEC commissioner

  • The US Securities and Exchange Commission's Robert Jackson hopes to prevent the kind of closed-end fund activism that funds like Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital have engaged in. 
  • Jackson, in an interview with Business Insider, said the SEC needs to protect the retail investors who choose closed-end funds for the fixed payouts the structure offers, and hopes to get the issue in front of the full commission before the end of the year.
  • "I'm not interested in protecting funds. I'm interested in protecting investors," the SEC commissioner told us. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

The closed-end fund activism that Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital made famous has gotten the attention of securities regulators.

Robert Jackson of the Securities and Exchange Commission told Business Insider that getting the issue in front of the SEC's full body was a priority for him — one he hopes to push forward before the end of the year. The chairman of the SEC, Jay Clayton, sets the agenda for what the commission will hear, and Jackson acknowledged that the timing will depend on Clayton's priorities. 

"I'm not interested in protecting funds, I'm interested in protecting investors," said Jackson, who noted that the "millions" of retail investors in closed-end funds are not interested in the short-term gains activist campaigns run by Saba and other hedge funds are looking to provide.

Closed-end funds' shares trade like stocks, allowing hedge funds to build large stakes and force changes to the funds' boards, often through proxy fights, which can result in funds liquidating for a quick return. On top of the time and money asset managers need to spend on proxy fights, liquidations can hurt their fee revenue, and activists can force them to pay out dividend-like tenders.

Asset managers like BlackRock, Neuberger Berman, and Legg Mason have tried to fight Saba in court and public opinion, but have so far been unsuccessful in stopping Weinstein and his peers from conducting campaigns. Closed-end funds have a fixed number of shares, and the price per share can sometimes decouple from the value of the underlying securities, making them an attractive mark for activists.  

See more: Saba Capital is targeting a unit of Legg Mason in an activist campaign. Another Legg Mason business stands to profit if it's successful.

One lawyer at an asset manager who asked not to be identified because it is in the midst of a campaign said their firm has asked the SEC to curtail the practice. 

"Frankly this is something the SEC has to care about," the person said. "This isn't constructive activism."

Hedge funds involved in the space push back on this criticism, however. The average closed-end fund trades at a price nearly 4% below the value of its holdings because of the fees and structure of the funds, hedge funds argue, and activism campaigns often push the share price closer to what the holdings are worth. 

Funds that prevent activists, either through majority ownership by the fund creator or through rules written into their charters, often have the greatest discounts. Bill Ackman's closed-end fund Pershing Square Holdings, which trades in the Netherlands, trades at a price more than 20% below what the holdings are worth, and is immune to activists thanks to Ackman's majority stake in it. 

"Closed-End funds with discounts to [net asset value] above 20% year after year have one thing in common — their investors are trapped due to conditions put in place by the manager to prevent activism. If activism were to be curtailed broadly, the immediate loss to mom and pop shareholders would likely be in excess of $40 billion. Through activism, managers can be compelled to reduce fees and narrow discounts, thereby improving long-term returns and liquidity for all market participants," Saba said in a statement provided to Business Insider. 

For his part, Jackson is taking the side of the closed-end fund providers, telling Business Insider that the retail investors are not interested in a quick bump in the trading price. 

"[Hedge funds'] best argument is 'why can't we be free to buy as many shares as we want and redeem them at a higher price?'" said the commissioner, who is expected to leave the regulator sometime this fall. "And my response to that is that's not the deal retail investors signed on to when they invested, and I'm here to protect them, not hedge funds."

Before Trump-appointed Jackson joined the SEC in January 2018, he had co-authored a paper on closed-end activism that found it often led to the liquidation of funds — something Jackson believes harms retail investors.

Funds like Saba point to the fact that closed-end funds that do liquidate give investors the chance to exit the fund at the highest value possible, and then re-invest in products with lower fees and similar payouts, like open-end mutual funds or ETFs.

A Morningstar report found that closed-end funds have fees that are significantly higher than their open-end counterparts, even when adjusted for the additional leverage that closed-end funds can use. 

Weinstein, whose fund runs more than $1.7 billion, has already beaten BlackRock in court, and has the backing of some of the biggest names in finance, counting EnTrust Global as an investor. The firm has not slowed down, even in the face of growing animosity from the asset management industry — Saba recently took a large stake in Eaton Vance's Floating Rate Income fund, which has $130 million in assets. 

See more: Hedge-fund investors want a deal on fees. Managers don't start negotiating until the check hits $120 million.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Wall Street pros and everyday investors have dramatically different views on the market. Here's why the chief strategist at Charles Schwab says that could spell deep trouble for stocks.

$
0
0

traders disagree

  • Data suggests that there's a growing split between some of the most experienced investors on Wall Street and the least.
  • According to statistics from SentimenTrader, hedge funds and institutional investors are growing more pessimistic about stocks while retail investors are getting more optimistic.
  • Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab, says that when the two groups disagree, the experienced investors are usually right.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

As much as Wall Street focuses on hard numbers like earnings, sales, and GDP growth, feelings are never far behind — although traders prefer the more concrete-sounding term "sentiment."

The importance of sentiment usually boils down to a few basic ideas. Are investors comfortable putting their money into the market? Are they more fearful than the facts say they should be? Are they irrationally optimistic, signaing they're unprepared for trouble?

But questions like that can lump all investors together. Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist at Charles Schwab, which has $3.8 trillion in assets under management, says she pays attention to lots of measures of sentiment, but is looking at a more complex question today: How are different groups of investors feeling?

Sonders explains that institutional investors, hedge funds, and other longtime pros are getting more pessimistic about the performance of stocks, while individual investors are getting far more optimistic. And the gap between them is getting large.

When those two types of investors strongly disagree, history shows that the first group is usually right and the second group is wrong — which is why Sonders and a lot of other pros call it "the smart money" and the second group "the dumb money."

"Typically at extremes and directionally, the smart money tends to be right and the dumb money tends to be wrong," Sonders said in an exclusive interview with Business Insider. That is, if the smart money is worried and dumb money is hopeful, the market is likely to fall. In the opposite scenario, stocks usually go up.

There are lots of investor surveys, but Sonders says she's keeping an eye on how these two groups are actually positioning their money. One importance source of data for her comes from Sundial Capital Research's SentimenTrader, which aims to track the behavior of both groups of investors.

The firm's Smart Money Confidence tracker includes data such as the relationship between stocks and bonds and commercial hedge fund positions inequity index futures. It also has a Dumb Money Confidence statistic based on inputs like stock-only put/call ratio and tracking small speculators in equity index futures contracts.

The chart below backs up the idea that there's a growing split between the two sides. It shows how wide the gap between "smart money" and "dumb money" has been over the past 10 years. It's been more extreme a few times over the last decade, including late last year, shortly before the market nosedived.

Sonders says that the trend could be a sign of danger for stocks.

Smart vs. dumb money

"Sentiment has started to look a little bit frothy," Sonders said, with stocks at all-time highs as investors focus on positives like the health of the economy, lower interest rates, and the "phase one" trade agreement, and ignore threats like fallout from the broader trade war and its effect on business investment.

"When sentiment starts to reflect that at an extreme, that tends to be a contrarian indicator for the market because it sets you up for disappointment," she added. "If everybody is optimistic and everybody thinks the market is great, they're probably invested already and there's not as much fuel going forward."

SEE ALSO: 'I would always rather be late': A chief researcher advising a $67 billion fund reveals his strategy for avoiding disaster in a market obsessed with growth

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A big-money investor in juggernauts like Facebook and Netflix breaks down the '3rd wave' firms that are leading the next round of tech disruption

Billionaire hedge-fund founder Ray Dalio says low interest rates have allowed companies to sell 'dreams instead of earnings'

$
0
0

Ray Dalio

  • Speaking at the Greenwich Economic Forum on Tuesday morning, the billionaire hedge-fund founder Ray Dalio told attendees that low interest rates created the boom of idealistic but money-losing companies.
  • "Because the world is looking for yield, companies can sell dreams instead of earnings," Dalio said at the Delamar Hotel in Greenwich, Connecticut.
  • There are fears that the era of the unicorn may be coming to an end, with the markets rejecting WeWork's failed IPO and Uber's struggles as a public company.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Two billionaires sat on a stage Tuesday morning in Greenwich, Connecticut, shocked at the state of the world.

The hedge-fund founders Ray Dalio and Paul Tudor Jones spent 45 minutes telling attendees of the Greenwich Economic Forum why the current situation in economics, politics, and everything in between has, as Dalio put it, "gone mad."

The two touched on topics from the 2020 election to capitalism fixes, but they agreed on one of the main drivers behind most global trends: ultralow interest rates.

A world starved for yield, Dalio said, has made investors look past traditional financial metrics when evaluating possible investments. 

"Because the world is looking for yield, companies can sell dreams instead of earnings," he said in Delamar Hotel's ballroom. "There's a reaching that's happening because people need yield."

While Dalio did not mention any companies by name, there have been several examples of how investors supported and possibly inflated companies despite a lack of a clear path to profitability. WeWork's valuation has been cut by about 80% since it pulled a planned initial public offering, and founder Adam Neumann was forced to step down by the firm's biggest investor, SoftBank.

Uber's stock price has continued to fall since its IPO as the ride-hailing company continues to turn in wide losses.

A recent story in The Atlantic on the unicorn boom said several of the biggest consumer-facing unicorns — with names like Peloton, Casper, and DoorDash — were spending billions more on luring new customers than they were going to bring in in revenue.

Greed is no longer good

But Dalio, who founded Bridgewater, said the low interest rates were hurting more than just investors that have been burned by bad unicorn bets. The smartest investors, he said, have allocated to credit, and that capital "is not going to trickle down" to the average person and the community at large — adding to the wealth gap the billionaire has called a national emergency.

Tudor Jones, who runs the eponymous hedge fund, believes the fix to the wealth gap and capitalism is "fairly easy." The focus can no longer solely be on shareholder returns, he said, adding that 6 million employees of public companies do not make a living wage. The era of Gordon Gekko's "greed-is-good" ethos has broken the system, he said.

"Greed got us the opioid crisis. Greed got us a wealth disparity that is five times worse than what it was 50 years ago. Greed got us the most divisive environment this country has ever had," Tudor Jones said. 

Dalio disagreed with Tudor Jones that investors like themselves could solve this issue simply by pressuring corporate boards to pay its employees more. Instead, he pitched getting a group of economists and people with "on-the-ground experience" together, and "locking them in a room for six months" to find a solution, but acknowledged it was a pipe dream.

"I think, instead, we are going to try and kill each other," Dalio said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio is sharing the apps behind the hedge fund's 'radical' culture with the public. They feature real-time employee ratings and a 'pain button.'

$
0
0

Ray Dalio

  • Billionaire hedge fund founder Ray Dalio is known for his "radical transparency" when it comes to corporate culture as much as for his investing prowess.
  • Dalio, the founder of Bridgewater, has built an algorithmic way of evaluating employees, who can in turn evaluate him in real time, and is planning to release the platform to the public in about three months. 
  • "I would know what you're thinking, you'd know what everyone else is thinking," he said. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Ray Dalio wants you to know what your co-workers and boss think about you all the time, in real time.

The billionaire founder of Bridgewater said he will soon be releasing to the public the employee feedback platform that the firm uses — starting with its well-known dot system in about three months. With that dot system, employees and bosses rate each other based on factors like assertiveness, intelligence, and open-mindedness. 

In a talk to a room full of investors and peers at the Greenwich Economic Forum on Tuesday afternoon, Dalio laid out why he thinks his strategy — which uses the same basic quantitative decision-making algorithms that the investment teams use — would work in any corporate setting. 

"It offers in-the-moment, computer-driven coaching on how to best handle a situation," he said. A video was played on the dot system, in which a Bridgewater employee — "Jenn, the 24-year-old fresh out of college"— challenges Dalio on the platform after he presents an idea. The presentation prompted some surprised laughter out of the crowd in the Delamar Hotel ballroom.

"Yep, we really do that," Dalio said to skeptical audience members after the video finished. 

The system, which includes tools that break down potential employees from their first interview to the end of their career, is laid out in one of Dalio's books on principles, which also is in app form. One of the tools, used when evaluating potential new employees, breaks down people by attributes so you can see them by their "Lego bits," Dalio said.

"You can say 'Ok, what are their attributes [I like] because I want another one of those," he said. 

Other tools include things like the daily update, so Dalio can keep track of people's stress levels, and the pain button, which employees click on when they are frustrated with a task. 

"Nature gave us psychological pain for a reason," Dalio said, describing the button, but added that it also forces you to come up with a plan to deal with it. If a task continues to frustrate an employee, then it is recorded.

"It creates a kind of bio feedback," he said. 

While Dalio called his corporate culture "radical," the billionaire is also confident it can work in any office or environment. When asked by the audience why he believes in the system's universality, he noted that the book on principles has been translated into 34 languages, and that he was told by people in China it was among the best-selling books in the country. 

Bosses and employees, he said, have to be comfortable with how they act and how people think about them. He asked how people would react if "I would know what you're thinking, you'd know what everyone else is thinking" during the talk. 

"Not everyone likes to look in the mirror."

SEE ALSO: Billionaire hedge-fund founder Ray Dalio says low interest rates have allowed companies to sell 'dreams instead of earnings'

SEE ALSO: Inside a meeting of elite investors, which mixed in yacht and jet sales pitches with doom-and-gloom recession talk

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Viewing all 1293 articles
Browse latest View live